To assess cool-roof benefits, the temperatures, heat flows, and energy uses in two similar single-family, single-story homes built side by side in Fresno, California were measured for a year. The “cool” house had a reflective cool concrete tile roof (initial albedo 0.51) with above-sheathing ventilation, and nearly twice the thermal capacitance of the standard dark asphalt shingle roof (initial albedo 0.07) on the “standard” house.
Cool-roof energy savings in the cooling and heating seasons were computed two ways. Method A divides by HVAC efficiency the difference (standard − cool) in ceiling + duct heat gain. Method B measures the difference in HVAC energy use, corrected for differences in plug and window heat gains.
Based on the more conservative Method B, annual cooling (compressor + fan), heating fuel, and heating fan site energy savings per unit ceiling area were 2.82 kWh/m2 (26%), 1.13 kWh/m2 (4%), and 0.0294 kWh/m2 (3%), respectively. Annual space conditioning (heating + cooling) source energy savings were 10.7 kWh/m2 (15%); annual energy cost savings were $0.886/m2 (20%). Annual conditioning CO2, NOx, and SO2 emission reductions were 1.63 kg/m2 (15%), 0.621 g/m2 (10%), and 0.0462 g/m2 (22%). Peak-hour cooling power demand reduction was 0.88 W/m2 (37%).
Energy and Buildings, Volume 80, September 2014, Pages 57–71
David Faulkner
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
Douglas P. Sullivan
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
Ronnen Levinson
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
Source: Elsevier
Publication Date: September 2014